[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq15xwvs3fl.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 21:09:06 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam
<mani@...nel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin
K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke
<hare@...e.de>, Janek Kotas <jank@...ence.com>,
Alim Akhtar
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bart Van
Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
Anjana
Hari <quic_ahari@...cinc.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] scsi: ufs: Remove overzealous memory barriers
Andrew,
> Please review with care as I'm not all that confident in this subject.
> UFS has a lot of mb() variants used, most with comments saying "ensure
> this takes effect before continuing". mb()'s aren't really the way to
> guarantee that, a read back is the best method.
Applied to 6.10/scsi-staging, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists