[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878r1q882w.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 00:00:55 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Peter
Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "Eric W.
Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Edward Liaw <edliaw@...gle.com>, Carlos Llamas
<cmllamas@...gle.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/timers/posix_timers: reimplement
check_timer_distribution()
On Sat, Apr 06 2024 at 17:10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Yes, this changes the "semantics" of check_timer_distribution(), perhaps it
> should be renamed.
Definitely.
> But I do not see a better approach, and in fact I think that
>
> Test that all running threads _eventually_ receive CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID
>
> is the wrong goal.
>
> Do you agree?
No argument from my side. All we can test is that the leader is not
woken up.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists