linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/3] Fix up qcom,halt-regs definition in various schemas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240407-qcom-halt-regs-fixup-v1-0-a0ea4e2c178e@z3ntu.xyz>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 11:58:29 +0200
From: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
To: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, 
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Fix up qcom,halt-regs definition in various schemas

The original motivation is that a bunch of other schemas fail to
validate qcom,halt-regs, for example like in the following examples:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dtb: remoteproc@...0000: qcom,halt-regs:0: [20] is too short
        from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/qcom,msm8916-mss-pil.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-ifc6640.dtb: remoteproc@...0000: qcom,halt-regs:0: [82] is too short
        from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/qcom,msm8996-mss-pil.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dtb: remoteproc@...0000: qcom,halt-regs:0: [32] is too short
        from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/qcom,msm8916-mss-pil.yaml#

While I'm actually not quite sure why these patches fix this in
the other schemas - feels like a bug/limitation in dt-schema maybe? -
the patches should be correct anyways to validate qcom,halt-regs in the
schemas I'm touching.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
---
Luca Weiss (3):
      dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pil: Fix qcom,halt-regs definition
      dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sc7280-wpss-pil: Fix qcom,halt-regs definition
      dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sdm845-adsp-pil: Fix qcom,halt-regs definition

 .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pil.yaml        | 6 +++++-
 .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc7280-wpss-pil.yaml        | 6 +++++-
 .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sdm845-adsp-pil.yaml        | 6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 8568bb2ccc278f344e6ac44af6ed010a90aa88dc
change-id: 20240407-qcom-halt-regs-fixup-2c6cce9734e4

Best regards,
-- 
Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>