[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DU0PR04MB9417C5B9BDD9E0B47E7494C088012@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 10:04:47 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
<peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix
Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Cristian Marussi
<cristian.marussi@....com>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: set
additionalProperties to true
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: set
> additionalProperties to true
>
> On 07/04/2024 02:37, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: set
> >> additionalProperties to true
> >>
> >> On 05/04/2024 14:39, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> >>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >>>
> >>> When adding vendor extension protocols, there is dt-schema warning:
> >>> "
> >>> imx,scmi.example.dtb: scmi: 'protocol@81', 'protocol@84' do not
> >>> match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> >>> "
> >>>
> >>> Set additionalProperties to true to address the issue.
> >>
> >> I do not see anything addressed here, except making the binding
> >> accepting anything anywhere...
> >
> > I not wanna add vendor protocols in arm,scmi.yaml, so will introduce a
> > new yaml imx.scmi.yaml which add i.MX SCMI protocol extension.
> >
> > With additionalProperties set to false, I not know how, please suggest.
>
> First of all, you cannot affect negatively existing devices (their
> bindings) and your patch does exactly that. This should make you thing what
> is the correct approach...
>
> Rob gave you the comment about missing compatible - you still did not
> address that.
I added the compatible in patch 2/6 in the examples "compatible = "arm,scmi";"
>
> You need common schema referenced in arm,scmi and your device specific
> schema, also using it.
ok, let me try to figure it out.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists