linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/7] dt-bindings: spmi: Add X1E80100 SPMI PMIC ARB schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:07:03 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, 
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, 
	David Collins <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/7] dt-bindings: spmi: Add X1E80100 SPMI PMIC ARB
 schema

On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 07:23:21PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Add dedicated schema for X1E80100 PMIC ARB (v7) as it allows multiple
> buses by declaring them as child nodes.
> 

But is this really a "dedicated schema for X1E80100"? Isn't it "the
schema for all multi-bus controllers"?

I.e. isn't this a "dedicated schema for all platforms starting with
SM8450"?

Can you please use the commit message to document the actual reason why
you choose to create a dedicated schema for this? Is it simply to avoid
having to schema with either pmics or multiple buses as children?

Regards,
Bjorn