[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05545ecdd2b05223b9204131b0ce9ba33460f44c.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 18:35:11 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 6.9.0-rc2+ kernel hangs on boot (bisected, maybe LED related)
On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 12:35 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> >
> > So, deadlock I guess....
> >
> > INFO: task kworker/5:13:648 blocked for more than 180 seconds.
> > Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2+ #23
> > "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > task:kworker/5:13 state:D stack:0 pid:648 tgid:648 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000
> > Workqueue: events deferred_probe_timeout_work_func
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > __schedule+0x43d/0xe20
> > schedule+0x31/0x130
> > schedule_timeout+0x1b9/0x1d0
> > ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
> > ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd6/0x170
> > __wait_for_common+0xb9/0x1d0
> > ? usleep_range_state+0xb0/0xb0
> > ? __flush_work+0x1ff/0x460
> > __flush_work+0x287/0x460
> > ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x120/0x120
> > deferred_probe_timeout_work_func+0x2b/0xa0
This seems ... complex.
Does changing iwlwifi's request_module() to request_module_nowait() in
iwl_req_fw_callback() (only) fix it? I think we can do that, we don't
really care at that point, and the issue here seems to be waiting for it
while also other modules are loading and due to the hashing in
idempotent() (kernel/module/main.c) it can't make progress.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists