linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Update the kernel documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 21:21:11 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Update the kernel documentation - add
 Return sections

On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:27:06AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> $ scripts/kernel-doc -v -none -Wall drivers/gpio/gpiolib* 2>&1 | grep -w warning | wc -l
> 67
> 
> Fix these by adding Return sections. While at it, make sure all of
> Return sections use the same style.

Bart, this is the biggest part from the v1, I would like to have that applied
first if no objections since it fixes kernel doc warnings. What do you think?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko