[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhRqSEbyd1rqVwfN@pavilion.home>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:06:00 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] perf: Remove perf_swevent_get_recursion_context()
from perf_pending_task().
Le Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 07:48:23AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit :
> perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() is supposed to avoid recursion.
> This requires to remain on the same CPU in order to decrement/ increment
> the same counter. This is done by using preempt_disable(). Having
> preemption disabled while sending a signal leads to locking problems on
> PREEMPT_RT because sighand, a spinlock_t, becomes a sleeping lock.
>
> This callback runs in task context and currently delivers only a signal
> to "itself". Any kind of recusrion protection in this context is not
> required.
>
> Remove recursion protection in perf_pending_task().
>
> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 12 ------------
> 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index e0b2da8de485f..5400f7ed2f98b 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -6785,14 +6785,6 @@ static void perf_pending_irq(struct irq_work *entry)
> static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> {
> struct perf_event *event = container_of(head, struct perf_event, pending_task);
> - int rctx;
> -
> - /*
> - * If we 'fail' here, that's OK, it means recursion is already disabled
> - * and we won't recurse 'further'.
> - */
> - preempt_disable_notrace();
> - rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
>
> if (event->pending_work) {
> event->pending_work = 0;
> @@ -6800,10 +6792,6 @@ static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
> local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
> }
>
> - if (rctx >= 0)
> - perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
> - preempt_enable_notrace();
Well, if a software event happens during perf_sigtrap(), the task work
may be requeued endlessly and the task may get stuck in task_work_run()...
> -
> put_event(event);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists