[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CH3PR11MB8436016A3DE30D26823E320BFF002@CH3PR11MB8436.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 06:39:05 +0000
From: "Liao, Bard" <bard.liao@...el.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linux-sound@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com" <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/7] soundwire: reconcile dp0_prop and dpn_prop
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 7:33 PM
> To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; pierre-
> louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com; Liao, Bard <bard.liao@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] soundwire: reconcile dp0_prop and dpn_prop
>
> On 26-03-24, 09:01, Bard Liao wrote:
> > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > The definitions for DP0 are missing a set of fields that are required
> > to reuse the same configuration code as DPn.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> > index e5d0aa58e7f6..e3a4bccc2a7e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> > @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ enum sdw_clk_stop_mode {
> > * @BRA_flow_controlled: Slave implementation results in an OK_NotReady
> > * response
> > * @simple_ch_prep_sm: If channel prepare sequence is required
> > - * @imp_def_interrupts: If set, each bit corresponds to support for
> > + * @ch_prep_timeout: Port-specific timeout value, in milliseconds
> > + * @imp_def_interrupts: If set, each bit corresponds to support for
>
> why is this line modified? seems to be same as previous and leading
> space added which might not be correct
Thanks for pointing this out. Sent v2 to fix it.
>
>
> > * implementation-defined interrupts
> > *
> > * The wordlengths are specified by Spec as max, min AND number of
> > @@ -249,6 +250,7 @@ struct sdw_dp0_prop {
> > u32 *words;
> > bool BRA_flow_controlled;
> > bool simple_ch_prep_sm;
> > + u32 ch_prep_timeout;
> > bool imp_def_interrupts;
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
> --
> ~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists