[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb525c6b-4284-4cb2-b3e1-20275fc3c4f3@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:36:37 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, Sean Christopherson
<seanjc@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: replace set_pte_at_notify() with just
set_pte_at()
On 05.04.24 13:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> With the demise of the .change_pte() MMU notifier callback, there is no
> notification happening in set_pte_at_notify(). It is a synonym of
> set_pte_at() and can be replaced with it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
A real joy seeing that gone
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists