[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhOhvM3HTsxTEXTT@louis-chauvet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:50:20 +0200
From: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
To: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@...labora.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>,
Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@...il.com>,
Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>,
Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, arthurgrillo@...eup.net,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeremie.dautheribes@...tlin.com,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
seanpaul@...gle.com, marcheu@...gle.com, nicolejadeyee@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/16] drm/vkms: Add support for DRM_FORMAT_R*
Le 28/03/24 - 16:00, Pekka Paalanen a écrit :
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:45:10 +0100
> Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > This add the support for:
> > - R1/R2/R4/R8
> >
> > R1 format was tested with [1] and [2].
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313-new_rotation-v2-0-6230fd5cae59@bootlin.com
> > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/igt-dev/20240306-b4-kms_tests-v1-0-8fe451efd2ac@bootlin.com/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c | 6 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> > index 863fc91d6d48..cbb2ec09564a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> > @@ -201,6 +201,11 @@ static struct pixel_argb_u16 argb_u16_from_RGB565(const u16 *pixel)
> > return out_pixel;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct pixel_argb_u16 argb_u16_from_gray8(u8 gray)
> > +{
> > + return argb_u16_from_u8888(255, gray, gray, gray);
> > +}
> > +
> > VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT struct pixel_argb_u16 argb_u16_from_yuv888(u8 y, u8 cb, u8 cr,
> > struct conversion_matrix *matrix)
> > {
> > @@ -269,6 +274,89 @@ static void black_to_argb_u16(const struct vkms_plane_state *plane, int x_start,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void Rx_read_line(const struct vkms_plane_state *plane, int x_start,
> > + int y_start, enum pixel_read_direction direction, int count,
> > + struct pixel_argb_u16 out_pixel[], u8 bit_per_pixel, u8 lum_per_level)
> > +{
> > + struct pixel_argb_u16 *end = out_pixel + count;
> > + u8 *src_pixels;
> > + int rem_x, rem_y;
> > +
> > + packed_pixels_addr(plane->frame_info, x_start, y_start, 0, &src_pixels, &rem_x, &rem_y);
>
> Maybe assert that rem_y = 0? Or block_h = 1.
Done for the v6.
> > + int bit_offset = (int)rem_x * bit_per_pixel;
>
> Why cast rem_x to int when it was defined to be int?
Because it was not the case for my first implementation, and I miss this
cast... Thanks.
> > + int step = get_step_next_block(plane->frame_info->fb, direction, 0);
> > + int mask = (0x1 << bit_per_pixel) - 1;
>
> Since mask will interact with u8, it should be unsigned too.
Ok, I will change it for the v6.
> > +
> > + if (direction == READ_LEFT_TO_RIGHT || direction == READ_RIGHT_TO_LEFT) {
> > + int restart_bit_offset = 0;
> > + int step_bit_offset = bit_per_pixel;
> > +
> > + if (direction == READ_RIGHT_TO_LEFT) {
> > + restart_bit_offset = 8 - bit_per_pixel;
> > + step_bit_offset = -bit_per_pixel;
> > + }
> > +
> > + while (out_pixel < end) {
> > + u8 val = (*src_pixels & (mask << bit_offset)) >> bit_offset;
>
> or shorter: (*src_pixels >> bit_offset) & mask
>
> However, shouldn't the first pixel be on the high bits?
Obviously yes... I missunderstood it... fixed in the v6 (and it will be
fixed in the next iteration of my igt series).
> That how I would understand the comments in drm_fourcc.h.
>
> Again a reason to avoid a solid color fill in IGT.
Yes, but in this case I wrote the IGT test too... So "wrong + wrong =
test SUCCESS" :)
There are some patterns in IGT, but they are only for "color". None of
them are available for "black and white"/"gray" formats.
> > +
> > + *out_pixel = argb_u16_from_gray8(val * lum_per_level);
> > +
> > + bit_offset += step_bit_offset;
> > + if (bit_offset < 0 || 8 <= bit_offset) {
> > + bit_offset = restart_bit_offset;
> > + src_pixels += step;
> > + }
> > + out_pixel += 1;
> > + }
> > + } else if (direction == READ_TOP_TO_BOTTOM || direction == READ_BOTTOM_TO_TOP) {
> > + while (out_pixel < end) {
> > + u8 val = (*src_pixels & (mask << bit_offset)) >> bit_offset;
> > + *out_pixel = argb_u16_from_gray8(val * lum_per_level);
> > + src_pixels += step;
> > + out_pixel += 1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void R1_read_line(const struct vkms_plane_state *plane, int x_start,
> > + int y_start, enum pixel_read_direction direction, int count,
> > + struct pixel_argb_u16 out_pixel[])
> > +{
> > + Rx_read_line(plane, x_start, y_start, direction, count, out_pixel, 1, 0xFF);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void R2_read_line(const struct vkms_plane_state *plane, int x_start,
> > + int y_start, enum pixel_read_direction direction, int count,
> > + struct pixel_argb_u16 out_pixel[])
> > +{
> > + Rx_read_line(plane, x_start, y_start, direction, count, out_pixel, 2, 0x55);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void R4_read_line(const struct vkms_plane_state *plane, int x_start,
> > + int y_start, enum pixel_read_direction direction, int count,
> > + struct pixel_argb_u16 out_pixel[])
> > +{
> > + Rx_read_line(plane, x_start, y_start, direction, count, out_pixel, 4, 0x11);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void R8_read_line(const struct vkms_plane_state *plane, int x_start,
> > + int y_start, enum pixel_read_direction direction, int count,
> > + struct pixel_argb_u16 out_pixel[])
> > +{
> > + struct pixel_argb_u16 *end = out_pixel + count;
> > + u8 *src_pixels;
> > + int rem_x, rem_y;
> > + int step = get_step_next_block(plane->frame_info->fb, direction, 0);
> > +
> > + packed_pixels_addr(plane->frame_info, x_start, y_start, 0, &src_pixels, &rem_x, &rem_y);
>
> Assert on block size?
Fixed in v6.
> > +
> > + while (out_pixel < end) {
> > + *out_pixel = argb_u16_from_gray8(*src_pixels);
> > + src_pixels += step;
> > + out_pixel += 1;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void ARGB8888_read_line(const struct vkms_plane_state *plane, int x_start, int y_start,
> > enum pixel_read_direction direction, int count,
> > struct pixel_argb_u16 out_pixel[])
> > @@ -582,6 +670,14 @@ pixel_read_line_t get_pixel_read_line_function(u32 format)
> > case DRM_FORMAT_YVU422:
> > case DRM_FORMAT_YVU444:
> > return &planar_yuv_read_line;
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_R1:
> > + return &R1_read_line;
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_R2:
> > + return &R2_read_line;
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_R4:
> > + return &R4_read_line;
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_R8:
> > + return &R8_read_line;
> > default:
> > /*
> > * This is a bug in vkms_plane_atomic_check. All the supported
> > @@ -855,6 +951,10 @@ get_conversion_matrix_to_argb_u16(u32 format, enum drm_color_encoding encoding,
> > case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB16161616:
> > case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB16161616:
> > case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_R1:
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_R2:
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_R4:
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_R8:
> > /*
> > * Those formats are supported, but they don't need a conversion matrix. Return
>
> It is strange that you need to list irrelevant formats here.
It is not needed anymore.
Thanks for your review,
Louis Chauvet
>
> > * a valid pointer to avoid kernel panic in case this matrix is used/checked
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c
> > index e21cc92cf497..dc9d62acf350 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c
> > @@ -29,7 +29,11 @@ static const u32 vkms_formats[] = {
> > DRM_FORMAT_YUV444,
> > DRM_FORMAT_YVU420,
> > DRM_FORMAT_YVU422,
> > - DRM_FORMAT_YVU444
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YVU444,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_R1,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_R2,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_R4,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_R8
> > };
> >
> > static struct drm_plane_state *
> >
>
> Thanks,
> pq
--
Louis Chauvet, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists