linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] clk: meson: axg: move reset controller's code to separate module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f01cdd910ab35316b8012795f73fd2b34c8e6f8e.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 10:21:47 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Jan Dakinevich
	 <jan.dakinevich@...utedevices.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Michael Turquette
 <mturquette@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,  Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Martin
 Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, 
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] clk: meson: axg: move reset controller's
 code to separate module

On So, 2024-04-07 at 19:39 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jerome Brunet (2024-04-02 07:52:38)
> > 
> > On Thu 28 Mar 2024 at 04:08, Jan Dakinevich <jan.dakinevich@...utedevices.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > This code will by reused by A1 SoC.
> > 
> > Could expand a bit please ?
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Dakinevich <jan.dakinevich@...utedevices.com>
> > 
> > In general, I like the idea.
> > 
> > We do have a couple a reset registers lost in middle of clocks and this
> > change makes it possible to re-use the code instead duplicating it.
> > 
> > The exported function would be used by audio clock controllers, but the
> > module created would be purely about reset.
> > 
> > One may wonder how it ended up in the clock tree, especially since the
> > kernel as a reset tree too.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if this should move to the reset framework or if it would
> > be an unnecessary churn. Stephen, Philipp, do you have an opinion on
> > this ?
> > 
> 
> I'd prefer it be made into an auxiliary device and the driver put in
> drivers/reset/ so we can keep reset code in the reset directory.

Seconded, the clk-mpfs/reset-mpfs and clk-starfive-jh7110-sys/reset-
starfive-jh7110 drivers are examples of this.

> The auxiliary device creation function can also be in the
> drivers/reset/ directory so that the clk driver calls some function
> to create and register the device.

I'm undecided about this, do you think mpfs_reset_controller_register()
and jh7110_reset_controller_register() should rather live with the
reset aux drivers in drivers/reset/ ?

regards
Philipp