linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/64] i2c: aspeed: reword according to newest specification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:35:52 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, 
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, 
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/64] i2c: aspeed: reword according to newest
 specification


> > -static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > +static int aspeed_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> >  				  struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
> 
> here the alignment goes a bi off.

Thanks, I missed this.

> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
> >  /* precondition: bus.lock has been acquired. */
> > -static void __aspeed_i2c_reg_slave(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u16 slave_addr)
> > +static void __aspeed_i2c_reg_target(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u16 slave_addr)
> 
> We  have the word master/slave forgotten here and there, but as
> we are here, /slave_addr/target_addr/

I can do this now. My plan was to convert it when I convert the whole
CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE interface. But "since we are here" can be argued.

> >  static const struct i2c_algorithm aspeed_i2c_algo = {
> > -	.master_xfer	= aspeed_i2c_master_xfer,
> > +	.xfer	= aspeed_i2c_xfer,
> 
> here the alignment goes a bit off.

I also wanted to fix this afterwards together with all the tab-indented
struct declarations in busses/. But maybe I better do the tab-removal
series beforehand? Would you accept such a thing?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)