| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 16:13:41 +0200
From: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
npiggin@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, rui.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] cpu/SMT: Allow enabling partial SMT states via
sysfs
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:51:40PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>
> Add support to the /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control interface for
> enabling a specified number of SMT threads per core, including partial
> SMT states where not all threads are brought online.
>
> The current interface accepts "on" and "off", to enable either 1 or all
> SMT threads per core.
>
> This commit allows writing an integer, between 1 and the number of SMT
> threads supported by the machine. Writing 1 is a synonym for "off", 2 or
> more enables SMT with the specified number of threads.
>
> When reading the file, if all threads are online "on" is returned, to
> avoid changing behaviour for existing users. If some other number of
> threads is online then the integer value is returned.
>
> Architectures like x86 only supporting 1 thread or all threads, should not
> define CONFIG_SMT_NUM_THREADS_DYNAMIC. Architecture supporting partial SMT
> states, like PowerPC, should define it.
This causes a regression:
https://groups.google.com/g/powerpc-utils-devel/c/wrwVzAAnRlI/m/5KJSoqP4BAAJ
The userspace code only changes the SMT mode of online CPUs (at lest one
thread is online) and does not touch offline CPUs.
Using this new interface offlined CPUs are onlined when SMT value is
set.
Would you look into special-casing the offline CPUs?
Thanks
Michal
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> [ldufour: slightly reword the commit's description]
> [ldufour: remove switch() in __store_smt_control()]
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306282340.Ihqm0fLA-lkp@intel.com/
> [ldufour: fix build issue in control_show()]
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 1 +
> kernel/cpu.c | 60 ++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> index ecd585ca2d50..6dba65fb1956 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> @@ -555,6 +555,7 @@ Description: Control Symmetric Multi Threading (SMT)
> ================ =========================================
> "on" SMT is enabled
> "off" SMT is disabled
> + "<N>" SMT is enabled with N threads per core.
> "forceoff" SMT is force disabled. Cannot be changed.
> "notsupported" SMT is not supported by the CPU
> "notimplemented" SMT runtime toggling is not
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 9a8d0685e055..7e8f1b044772 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -2876,11 +2876,19 @@ static const struct attribute_group cpuhp_cpu_root_attr_group = {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT
>
> +static bool cpu_smt_num_threads_valid(unsigned int threads)
> +{
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMT_NUM_THREADS_DYNAMIC))
> + return threads >= 1 && threads <= cpu_smt_max_threads;
> + return threads == 1 || threads == cpu_smt_max_threads;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t
> __store_smt_control(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> - int ctrlval, ret;
> + int ctrlval, ret, num_threads, orig_threads;
> + bool force_off;
>
> if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED)
> return -EPERM;
> @@ -2888,30 +2896,39 @@ __store_smt_control(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (sysfs_streq(buf, "on"))
> + if (sysfs_streq(buf, "on")) {
> ctrlval = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
> - else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "off"))
> + num_threads = cpu_smt_max_threads;
> + } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "off")) {
> ctrlval = CPU_SMT_DISABLED;
> - else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "forceoff"))
> + num_threads = 1;
> + } else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "forceoff")) {
> ctrlval = CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED;
> - else
> + num_threads = 1;
> + } else if (kstrtoint(buf, 10, &num_threads) == 0) {
> + if (num_threads == 1)
> + ctrlval = CPU_SMT_DISABLED;
> + else if (cpu_smt_num_threads_valid(num_threads))
> + ctrlval = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> ret = lock_device_hotplug_sysfs();
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (ctrlval != cpu_smt_control) {
> - switch (ctrlval) {
> - case CPU_SMT_ENABLED:
> - ret = cpuhp_smt_enable();
> - break;
> - case CPU_SMT_DISABLED:
> - case CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED:
> - ret = cpuhp_smt_disable(ctrlval);
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + orig_threads = cpu_smt_num_threads;
> + cpu_smt_num_threads = num_threads;
> +
> + force_off = ctrlval != cpu_smt_control && ctrlval == CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED;
> +
> + if (num_threads > orig_threads)
> + ret = cpuhp_smt_enable();
> + else if (num_threads < orig_threads || force_off)
> + ret = cpuhp_smt_disable(ctrlval);
>
> unlock_device_hotplug();
> return ret ? ret : count;
> @@ -2939,6 +2956,17 @@ static ssize_t control_show(struct device *dev,
> {
> const char *state = smt_states[cpu_smt_control];
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT
> + /*
> + * If SMT is enabled but not all threads are enabled then show the
> + * number of threads. If all threads are enabled show "on". Otherwise
> + * show the state name.
> + */
> + if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_ENABLED &&
> + cpu_smt_num_threads != cpu_smt_max_threads)
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", cpu_smt_num_threads);
> +#endif
> +
> return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%s\n", state);
> }
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists