| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240408141720.98832-7-richardbgobert@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 16:17:20 +0200
From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
dsahern@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 6/6] selftests/net: add flush id selftests
Added flush id selftests to test different cases where DF flag is set or
unset and id value changes in the following packets. All cases where the
packets should coalesce or should not coalesce are tested.
Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 144 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
index 353e1e867fbb..74ab06953c38 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/gro.c
@@ -617,6 +617,120 @@ static void add_ipv6_exthdr(void *buf, void *optpkt, __u8 exthdr_type, char *ext
iph->payload_len = htons(ntohs(iph->payload_len) + MIN_EXTHDR_SIZE);
}
+static void fix_ip4_checksum(struct iphdr *iph)
+{
+ iph->check = 0;
+ iph->check = checksum_fold(iph, sizeof(struct iphdr), 0);
+}
+
+static void send_flush_id_case(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr, int tcase)
+{
+ bool send_three = false;
+ static char buf1[MAX_HDR_LEN + PAYLOAD_LEN];
+ static char buf2[MAX_HDR_LEN + PAYLOAD_LEN];
+ static char buf3[MAX_HDR_LEN + PAYLOAD_LEN];
+
+ create_packet(buf1, 0, 0, PAYLOAD_LEN, 0);
+ create_packet(buf2, PAYLOAD_LEN, 0, PAYLOAD_LEN, 0);
+ create_packet(buf3, PAYLOAD_LEN * 2, 0, PAYLOAD_LEN, 0);
+
+ struct iphdr *iph1 = (struct iphdr *)(buf1 + ETH_HLEN);
+ struct iphdr *iph2 = (struct iphdr *)(buf2 + ETH_HLEN);
+ struct iphdr *iph3 = (struct iphdr *)(buf3 + ETH_HLEN);
+
+ switch (tcase) {
+ case 0: /* DF=1, Incrementing - should coalesce */
+ iph1->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph1->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph1);
+
+ iph2->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph2->id = htons(9);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph2);
+ break;
+
+ case 1: /* DF=1, Fixed - should coalesce */
+ iph1->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph1->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph1);
+
+ iph2->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph2->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph2);
+ break;
+
+ case 2: /* DF=0, Incrementing - should coalesce */
+ iph1->frag_off &= ~htons(IP_DF);
+ iph1->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph1);
+
+ iph2->frag_off &= ~htons(IP_DF);
+ iph2->id = htons(9);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph2);
+ break;
+
+ case 3: /* DF=0, Fixed - should not coalesce */
+ iph1->frag_off &= ~htons(IP_DF);
+ iph1->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph1);
+
+ iph2->frag_off &= ~htons(IP_DF);
+ iph2->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph2);
+ break;
+
+ case 4: /* DF=1, two packets incrementing, and one fixed - should
+ * coalesce only the first two packets
+ */
+ iph1->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph1->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph1);
+
+ iph2->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph2->id = htons(9);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph2);
+
+ iph3->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph3->id = htons(9);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph3);
+ send_three = true;
+ break;
+
+ case 5: /* DF=1, two packets fixed, and one incrementing - should
+ * coalesce only the first two packets
+ */
+ iph1->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph1->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph1);
+
+ iph2->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph2->id = htons(8);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph2);
+
+ iph3->frag_off |= htons(IP_DF);
+ iph3->id = htons(9);
+ fix_ip4_checksum(iph3);
+ send_three = true;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ write_packet(fd, buf1, total_hdr_len + PAYLOAD_LEN, daddr);
+ write_packet(fd, buf2, total_hdr_len + PAYLOAD_LEN, daddr);
+
+ if (send_three)
+ write_packet(fd, buf3, total_hdr_len + PAYLOAD_LEN, daddr);
+}
+
+static void test_flush_id(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr, char *fin_pkt)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
+ sleep(1);
+ send_flush_id_case(fd, daddr, i);
+ sleep(1);
+ write_packet(fd, fin_pkt, total_hdr_len, daddr);
+ }
+}
+
static void send_ipv6_exthdr(int fd, struct sockaddr_ll *daddr, char *ext_data1, char *ext_data2)
{
static char buf[MAX_HDR_LEN + PAYLOAD_LEN];
@@ -935,6 +1049,8 @@ static void gro_sender(void)
send_fragment4(txfd, &daddr);
sleep(1);
write_packet(txfd, fin_pkt, total_hdr_len, &daddr);
+
+ test_flush_id(txfd, &daddr, fin_pkt);
} else if (proto == PF_INET6) {
sleep(1);
send_fragment6(txfd, &daddr);
@@ -1061,6 +1177,34 @@ static void gro_receiver(void)
printf("fragmented ip4 doesn't coalesce: ");
check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 2);
+
+ /* is_atomic checks */
+ printf("DF=1, Incrementing - should coalesce: ");
+ correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
+ check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 1);
+
+ printf("DF=1, Fixed - should coalesce: ");
+ correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
+ check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 1);
+
+ printf("DF=0, Incrementing - should coalesce: ");
+ correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
+ check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 1);
+
+ printf("DF=0, Fixed - should not coalesce: ");
+ correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
+ correct_payload[1] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
+ check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 2);
+
+ printf("DF=1, 2 Incrementing and one fixed - should coalesce only first 2 packets: ");
+ correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
+ correct_payload[1] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
+ check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 2);
+
+ printf("DF=1, 2 Fixed and one incrementing - should coalesce only first 2 packets: ");
+ correct_payload[0] = PAYLOAD_LEN * 2;
+ correct_payload[1] = PAYLOAD_LEN;
+ check_recv_pkts(rxfd, correct_payload, 2);
} else if (proto == PF_INET6) {
/* GRO doesn't check for ipv6 hop limit when flushing.
* Hence no corresponding test to the ipv4 case.
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists