linux-kernel - Re: [bug report] HID: playstation: DS4: Don't fail on calibration data request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <07848795-14e3-4020-9e60-e3221ff6ef80@enpas.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 16:44:05 +0200
From: Max Staudt <max@...as.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Roderick Colenbrander <roderick.colenbrander@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] HID: playstation: DS4: Don't fail on calibration
 data request

On 4/8/24 09:41, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Max Staudt,
> 
> Commit a48a7cd85f55 ("HID: playstation: DS4: Don't fail on
> calibration data request") from Feb 8, 2024 (linux-next), leads to
> the following Smatch static checker warning:
> 
> drivers/hid/hid-playstation.c:1904 dualshock4_get_calibration_data() error: uninitialized symbol 'acc_x_minus'.
> drivers/hid/hid-playstation.c:1904 dualshock4_get_calibration_data() error: uninitialized symbol 'acc_x_plus'.
> drivers/hid/hid-playstation.c:1910 dualshock4_get_calibration_data() error: uninitialized symbol 'acc_y_minus'.
> drivers/hid/hid-playstation.c:1910 dualshock4_get_calibration_data() error: uninitialized symbol 'acc_y_plus'.
> drivers/hid/hid-playstation.c:1916 dualshock4_get_calibration_data() error: uninitialized symbol 'acc_z_minus'.
> drivers/hid/hid-playstation.c:1916 dualshock4_get_calibration_data() error: uninitialized symbol 'acc_z_plus'.


Hi Dan, Jiri,

Thanks for the report!


Jiri, if you prefer to do so, please feel free to stop/revert this patch for now, and I'll send a better one soon.

The label "no_buffer_tail_check" was meant to jump straight to the sanity checks in order to have them write the fallback calibration values. But I missed that the part in between the two sanity checks can actually make the second sanity check pass with bogus values - as shown by Dan's check.


Max