[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b659ba3fa50482a8338b1a6942884cc@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:51:13 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Haris Okanovic' <harisokn@...zon.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-assembly@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-assembly@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: add __READ_ONCE_EX()
From: Haris Okanovic
> Sent: 02 April 2024 02:47
>
> Perform an exclusive load, which atomically loads a word and arms the
> execusive monitor to enable wfe() polling of an address.
>
> Adding this macro in preparation for an arm64 cpuidle driver which
> supports a wfe() based polling state.
>
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dht0008/a/arm-synchronization-primitives/exclusive-
> accesses/exclusive-monitors
>
> Signed-off-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@...zon.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/readex.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/readex.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/readex.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/readex.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..51963c3107e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/readex.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Based on arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_READEX_H
> +#define __ASM_READEX_H
> +
> +#define __LOAD_EX(sfx, regs...) "ldaxr" #sfx "\t" #regs
> +
> +#define __READ_ONCE_EX(x) \
> +({ \
> + typeof(&(x)) __x = &(x); \
> + int atomic = 1; \
> + union { __unqual_scalar_typeof(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
> + switch (sizeof(x)) { \
> + case 1: \
> + asm volatile(__LOAD_EX(b, %w0, %1) \
> + : "=r" (*(__u8 *)__u.__c) \
> + : "Q" (*__x) : "memory"); \
> + break; \
> + case 2: \
> + asm volatile(__LOAD_EX(h, %w0, %1) \
> + : "=r" (*(__u16 *)__u.__c) \
> + : "Q" (*__x) : "memory"); \
> + break; \
> + case 4: \
> + asm volatile(__LOAD_EX(, %w0, %1) \
> + : "=r" (*(__u32 *)__u.__c) \
> + : "Q" (*__x) : "memory"); \
> + break; \
> + case 8: \
> + asm volatile(__LOAD_EX(, %0, %1) \
> + : "=r" (*(__u64 *)__u.__c) \
> + : "Q" (*__x) : "memory"); \
> + break; \
> + default: \
> + atomic = 0; \
> + } \
> + atomic ? (typeof(*__x))__u.__val : (*(volatile typeof(__x))__x);\
I'm pretty sure that doesn't work the way you expect.
The ?: operator promotes 'unsigned char' to 'int'.
So you can fall foul of signedness tests (eg in min()).
It also isn't going to work for non-scalers.
Replacing the ?: with __builtin_choose_expr() may help.
(This is probably a bug in the code you copied.)
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists