linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86/resctrl: Track llc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b51dd1db-12a7-4618-a660-85f70c7ccd5d@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 08:58:50 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>, Haifeng Xu
	<haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
CC: <james.morse@....com>, <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <babu.moger@....com>,
	<bp@...en8.de>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <peternewman@...gle.com>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86/resctrl: Track llc_occupancy of RMIDs in limbo
 list



On 4/8/2024 8:29 AM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 03:44:00PM +0800, Haifeng Xu wrote:
>> I can also reproduced it. After digging into it, I found that our DKIM signature header
>> has 't' and 'x' flags. They are recommended as a means to help identify spam.
>>
>> t= is the DKIM signature timestamp.
>> x= is the DKIM signature expiration time.
>>
>> The source code of DKIM Validation can be seen in dkim/__init__.py(line 351), I paste it
>> here.
>>
>>  343     if b'x' in sig:
>>  344         if re.match(br"\d+$", sig[b'x']) is None:
>>  345             raise ValidationError(
>>  346               "x= value is not a decimal integer (%s)" % sig[b'x'])
>>  347         x_sign = int(sig[b'x'])
>>  348         now = int(time.time())
>>  349         slop = 36000 # 10H leeway for mailers with inaccurate clocks
>>  350         if x_sign < now - slop:
>>  351             raise ValidationError(
>>  352                 "x= value is past (%s)" % sig[b'x'])
>>  353             if x_sign < t_sign:
>>  354                 raise ValidationError(
>>  355                     "x= value is less than t= value (x=%s t=%s)" %
>>  356                     (sig[b'x'], sig[b't']))
>>
>> The expiry time is less than the time point you download the patch, so the validation
>> fails. If I comment out these lines, this series can be successfully downloaded.
> 
> FWIW, I've requested ability to ignore the x= flag when validating signatures:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/dkimpy/+bug/2047054

Thank you very much Haifeng and Konstantin.

Reinette