linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8450: fix DisplayPort clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ad3e3201fbea1f73f1550877d5c12ba5.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 19:34:52 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8450: fix DisplayPort clocks

Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2024-04-08 04:47:04)
> On SM8450 DisplayPort link clocks use frequency tables inherited from
> the vendor kernel, it is not applicable in the upstream kernel. Drop
> frequency tables and use clk_byte2_ops for those clocks.

The subject says "fix", but does this fix anything, or simply optimize?
Is something broken by having the frequency table?