linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: Implement ChromeOS UCSI driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB2FV=4_TYP=uBHjJLDwKOdnyfdurX5k5LqqtOPpX4er1fKiZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:47:35 -0700
From: Pavan Holla <pholla@...omium.org>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, 
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, 
	Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: Implement ChromeOS UCSI driver

I've uploaded v4. PTAL.

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 1:13 AM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> How this driver get probed?  From drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c?  If so, there is
> no "cros-ec-ucsi" in the MFD driver yet.

Yes, this should get probed from drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c. However, the
corresponding change in the EC is still under review. I was planning to send
it out once the EC change lands. Please let me know if you think that this
review should wait until then.

>
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/cros_ec_ucsi.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/cros_ec_ucsi.c
> > [...]
> > +static int cros_ucsi_async_write(struct ucsi *ucsi, unsigned int offset,
> > +                              const void *val, size_t val_len)
> > +{
> > +     struct cros_ucsi_data *udata = ucsi_get_drvdata(ucsi);
> > +     uint8_t ec_buffer[MAX_EC_DATA_SIZE + sizeof(struct ec_params_ucsi_ppm_set)];
> > +     struct ec_params_ucsi_ppm_set *req = (struct ec_params_ucsi_ppm_set *)ec_buffer;
> > +     int ret = 0;
>
> The initialization is redundant.  `ret` will be overridden soon.

Removed.

>
> > +     if (val_len > MAX_EC_DATA_SIZE) {
> > +             dev_err(udata->dev, "Can't write %zu bytes. Too big.", val_len);
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     memset(req, 0, sizeof(ec_buffer));
>
> The `memset` is redundant.

Removed.

>
> > +     req->offset = offset;
> > +     memcpy(req->data, val, val_len);
> > +     ret = cros_ec_cmd(udata->ec, 0, EC_CMD_UCSI_PPM_SET,
> > +                       req, sizeof(struct ec_params_ucsi_ppm_set) + val_len, NULL, 0);
>
> `sizeof(*req)`.

Done.

>
> > +static int cros_ucsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > [...]
> > +     udata->ucsi = ucsi_create(udata->dev, &cros_ucsi_ops);
>
> `dev`.
>
> > [...]
> > +static const struct platform_device_id cros_ec_ucsi_id[] = {
>
> To be consistent with other symbols, consider either:
> - s/cros_ec_/cros_/ for the symbol.
> or
> - s/cros_ucsi_/cros_ec_ucsi_/g for echoing the file name.

Replaced cros_ec_ucsi_id with cros_ucsi_id.

> > +     { "cros-ec-ucsi"},
>
> The driver has declared DRV_NAME, use it.  `{ DRV_NAME, 0 },`.
>

Used DRV_NAME.

> > +     {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cros_ec_ucsi_id);
>
> Ditto.

Replaced cros_ec_ucsi_id with cros_ucsi_id.

> > +static struct platform_driver cros_ucsi_driver = {
> > +     .driver = {
> > +             .name = DRV_NAME,
> > +             .pm = &cros_ucsi_pm_ops,
> > +     },
> > +     .id_table = cros_ec_ucsi_id,
>
> Ditto.

Replaced cros_ec_ucsi_id with cros_ucsi_id.

Thanks,
Pavan