[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhVoatdJZ1RWu2r3@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:10:18 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, naoya.horiguchi@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure: fix deadlock when
hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap is enabled
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:10:22PM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 04:54:56PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> > In short, below scene breaks the lock dependency chain:
> >
> > memory_failure
> > __page_handle_poison
> > zone_pcp_disable -- lock(pcp_batch_high_lock)
> > dissolve_free_huge_page
> > __hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio
> > static_key_slow_dec
> > cpus_read_lock -- rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock)
> >
> > Fix this by calling drain_all_pages() instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
On a second though,
disabling pcp via zone_pcp_disable() was a deterministic approach.
Now, with drain_all_pages() we drain PCP queues to buddy, but nothing
guarantees that those pages do not end up in a PCP queue again before we
the call to take_page_off_budy() if we
need refilling, right?
I guess we can live with that because we will let the system know that we
failed to isolate that page.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists