lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 18:14:01 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, 
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Rockchip on-SoC codecs should depend on
 ARCH_ROCKCHIP

On Tue, 09 Apr 2024 17:34:56 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The various Rockchip embedded audio codecs are only present on Rockchip
> SoCs.  Hence add dependencies on ARCH_ROCKCHIP, to prevent asking the
> user about these drivers when configuring a kernel without Rockchip SoC
> support.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: codecs: Rockchip on-SoC codecs should depend on ARCH_ROCKCHIP
      commit: 9fd60615ad2835d8e0081fd2458721c8b994f28f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ