lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:37:21 -0500
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,  Linus Torvalds
 <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,  Roberto Sassu
 <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>,  linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,  linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  Roberto Sassu
 <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] security changes for v6.9-rc3


Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> writes:

> I know it's everyone's favorite hobby to bash the LSM and LSM devs,
> but it's important to note that we don't add hooks without working
> with the associated subsystem devs to get approval.

Hah!!!!

> In the cases
> where we don't get an explicit ACK, there is an on-list approval, or
> several ignored on-list attempts over weeks/months/years.  We want to
> be good neighbors.

Hah!!!!

You merged a LSM hook that is only good for breaking chrome's sandbox,
over my expressed objections.  After I tested and verified that
is what it does.

I asked for testing. None was done.  It was claimed that no
security sensitive code would ever fail to check and deal with
all return codes, so no testing was necessary.  Then later a
whole bunch of security sensitive code that didn't was found.

The only redeeming grace has been that no-one ever actually uses
that misbegotten security hook.

P.S.  Sorry for this off topic rant but sheesh.   At least from
my perspective you deserve plenty of bashing.

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ