linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/31] x86/resctrl: Fix allocation of cleanest CLOSID on platforms with no monitors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0cbc22c1-a35c-4ad8-8f3b-f7a7b034d944@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 20:13:40 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin
	<hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, D Scott Phillips OS
	<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
	<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
	<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
	<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
	"Dave Martin" <dave.martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/31] x86/resctrl: Fix allocation of cleanest CLOSID
 on platforms with no monitors

Hi James,

On 3/21/2024 9:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
> commit 6eac36bb9eb0 ("x86/resctrl: Allocate the cleanest CLOSID by
> searching closid_num_dirty_rmid") added a Kconfig option that causes

Please see section about "Fixes" tags in section "Ordering of commit tags"
in Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst

> resctrl to search for the CLOSID with the fewest dirty cache lines when
> creating a new control group. This depends on the values read from the
> llc_occupancy counters.
> 
> This support missed that some platforms may not have these counters.
> This causes a NULL pointer dereference when creating a new control
> group as the array was not allocated by dom_data_init().
> 
> As this feature isn't necessary on platforms that don't have cache
> occupancy monitors, add this to the check that occurs when a new
> control group is allocated.
> 
> The existing code is not selected by any upstream platform, it makes
> no sense to backport this patch to stable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 011e17efb1a6..1767c1affa60 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static int closid_alloc(void)
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>  
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID) &&
> +	    is_llc_occupancy_enabled()) {
>  		cleanest_closid = resctrl_find_cleanest_closid();
>  		if (cleanest_closid < 0)
>  			return cleanest_closid;

Patch looks good.

Thank you

Reinette