linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: pcm: perform power-down delay checks a bit faster

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <171269542042.178415.9248384379060261944.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 21:43:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: pcm: perform power-down delay checks a bit
 faster

On Tue, 09 Apr 2024 19:56:36 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
> When checking whether the power-down delay should be ignored for a specific
> PCM runtime, there's no need to keep going through all DAI link components
> after any of them is found to be configured to use the power-down delay.
> 
> While there, fix a small typo in one of the comment blocks.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: pcm: perform power-down delay checks a bit faster
      commit: f78bf2c933c9cb3b61215378664f83c5abd25374

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark