lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <SE1P216MB130327BE82553DA3F34BBF17ED072@SE1P216MB1303.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 04:50:15 +0000
From: jackson.lee <jackson.lee@...psnmedia.com>
To: Ivan Bornyakov <brnkv.i1@...il.com>, Nas Chung
	<nas.chung@...psnmedia.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Sebastian Fricke
	<sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
CC: "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/5] media: chips-media: wave5: drop "sram-size" DT
 prop

Hey Ivan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Bornyakov <brnkv.i1@...il.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2024 1:41 AM
> To: Nas Chung <nas.chung@...psnmedia.com>; jackson.lee
> <jackson.lee@...psnmedia.com>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>;
> Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>; Sebastian Fricke
> <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
> Cc: Ivan Bornyakov <brnkv.i1@...il.com>; linux-media@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] media: chips-media: wave5: drop "sram-size" DT
> prop
> 
> Move excessive "sram-size" device-tree property to device match data.
> Also change SRAM memory allocation strategy: instead of allocation exact
> sram_size bytes, allocate all available SRAM memory up to sram_size.
> Add placeholders wave5_vpu_dec_validate_sec_axi() and
> wave5_vpu_enc_validate_sec_axi() for validation that allocated SRAM memory
> is enough to decode/encode bitstream of given resolution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <brnkv.i1@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c     | 62 +++++++++++++++++--
>  .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c    | 21 ++++---
>  .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c    | 11 ++--
>  3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> index cdd0a0948a94..36f2fc818013 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> @@ -843,6 +843,36 @@ int wave5_vpu_dec_register_framebuffer(struct
> vpu_instance *inst, struct frame_b
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +static u32 wave5_vpu_dec_validate_sec_axi(struct vpu_instance *inst) {
> +	struct dec_info *p_dec_info = &inst->codec_info->dec_info;
> +	u32 bit_size = 0, ip_size = 0, lf_size = 0, ret = 0;

The bit_size, ip_size and 1f_size is always 0? If so, why are you using them ?


> +	u32 sram_size = inst->dev->sram_size;
> +
> +	if (!sram_size)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * TODO: calculate bit_size, ip_size, lf_size from inst-
> >src_fmt.width
> +	 * and inst->codec_info->dec_info.initial_info.luma_bitdepth
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_bit_enable && sram_size >=
> bit_size) {
> +		ret |= BIT(0);
> +		sram_size -= bit_size;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_ip_enable && sram_size >= ip_size)
> {
> +		ret |= BIT(9);
> +		sram_size -= ip_size;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_lf_row_enable && sram_size >=
> lf_size)
> +		ret |= BIT(15);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int wave5_vpu_decode(struct vpu_instance *inst, u32 *fail_res)  {
>  	u32 reg_val;
> @@ -855,9 +885,7 @@ int wave5_vpu_decode(struct vpu_instance *inst, u32
> *fail_res)
>  	vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_BS_OPTION,
> get_bitstream_options(p_dec_info));
> 
>  	/* secondary AXI */
> -	reg_val = p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_bit_enable |
> -		(p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_ip_enable << 9) |
> -		(p_dec_info->sec_axi_info.use_lf_row_enable << 15);
> +	reg_val = wave5_vpu_dec_validate_sec_axi(inst);
>  	vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_USE_SEC_AXI, reg_val);
> 
>  	/* set attributes of user buffer */
> @@ -1938,6 +1966,31 @@ int wave5_vpu_enc_register_framebuffer(struct
> device *dev, struct vpu_instance *
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +static u32 wave5_vpu_enc_validate_sec_axi(struct vpu_instance *inst) {
> +	struct enc_info *p_enc_info = &inst->codec_info->enc_info;
> +	u32 rdo_size = 0, lf_size = 0, ret = 0;

The rdo_size and 1f_size is always 0? If so, why are you using them ?

> +	u32 sram_size = inst->dev->sram_size;
> +
> +	if (!sram_size)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * TODO: calculate rdo_size and lf_size from inst->src_fmt.width
> and
> +	 * inst->codec_info-
> >enc_info.open_param.wave_param.internal_bit_depth
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (p_enc_info->sec_axi_info.use_enc_rdo_enable && sram_size >=
> rdo_size) {
> +		ret |= BIT(11);
> +		sram_size -= rdo_size;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (p_enc_info->sec_axi_info.use_enc_lf_enable && sram_size >=
> lf_size)
> +		ret |= BIT(15);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int wave5_vpu_encode(struct vpu_instance *inst, struct enc_param *option,
> u32 *fail_res)  {
>  	u32 src_frame_format;
> @@ -1959,8 +2012,7 @@ int wave5_vpu_encode(struct vpu_instance *inst,
> struct enc_param *option, u32 *f
> 
>  	vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_ENC_PIC_SRC_AXI_SEL,
> DEFAULT_SRC_AXI);
>  	/* secondary AXI */
> -	reg_val = (p_enc_info->sec_axi_info.use_enc_rdo_enable << 11) |
> -		(p_enc_info->sec_axi_info.use_enc_lf_enable << 15);
> +	reg_val = wave5_vpu_enc_validate_sec_axi(inst);
>  	vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_ENC_PIC_USE_SEC_AXI, reg_val);
> 
>  	vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_ENC_PIC_REPORT_PARAM, 0); diff --
> git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c
> index 3809f70bc0b4..556de2f043fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vdi.c


The below code is not based on the current upstream code. Where did you get the original code ?

> @@ -174,16 +174,19 @@ int wave5_vdi_allocate_array(struct vpu_device
> *vpu_dev, struct vpu_buf *array,  void wave5_vdi_allocate_sram(struct
> vpu_device *vpu_dev)  {
>  	struct vpu_buf *vb = &vpu_dev->sram_buf;
> +	dma_addr_t daddr;
> +	void *vaddr;
> +	size_t size;
> 
> -	if (!vpu_dev->sram_pool || !vpu_dev->sram_size)
> +	if (!vpu_dev->sram_pool || vb->vaddr)
>  		return;
> 
> -	if (!vb->vaddr) {
> -		vb->size = vpu_dev->sram_size;
> -		vb->vaddr = gen_pool_dma_alloc(vpu_dev->sram_pool, vb->size,
> -					       &vb->daddr);
> -		if (!vb->vaddr)
> -			vb->size = 0;
> +	size = min_t(size_t, vpu_dev->sram_size, gen_pool_avail(vpu_dev-
> >sram_pool));
> +	vaddr = gen_pool_dma_alloc(vpu_dev->sram_pool, size, &daddr);
> +	if (vaddr) {
> +		vb->vaddr = vaddr;
> +		vb->daddr = daddr;
> +		vb->size = size;
>  	}
> 
>  	dev_dbg(vpu_dev->dev, "%s: sram daddr: %pad, size: %zu, vaddr:
> 0x%p\n", @@ -197,9 +200,7 @@ void wave5_vdi_free_sram(struct vpu_device
> *vpu_dev)
>  	if (!vb->size || !vb->vaddr)
>  		return;
> 
> -	if (vb->vaddr)
> -		gen_pool_free(vpu_dev->sram_pool, (unsigned long)vb->vaddr,
> -			      vb->size);
> +	gen_pool_free(vpu_dev->sram_pool, (unsigned long)vb->vaddr, vb-
> >size);
> 
>  	memset(vb, 0, sizeof(*vb));
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> index 1e631da58e15..9e93969ab6db 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  struct wave5_match_data {
>  	int flags;
>  	const char *fw_name;
> +	u32 sram_size;
>  };
> 
>  int wave5_vpu_wait_interrupt(struct vpu_instance *inst, unsigned int
> timeout) @@ -177,17 +178,12 @@ static int wave5_vpu_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_reset_assert;
>  	}
> 
> -	ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "sram-size",
> -				   &dev->sram_size);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "sram-size not found\n");
> -		dev->sram_size = 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	dev->sram_pool = of_gen_pool_get(pdev->dev.of_node, "sram", 0);
>  	if (!dev->sram_pool)
>  		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "sram node not found\n");
> 
> +	dev->sram_size = match_data->sram_size;
> +
>  	dev->product_code = wave5_vdi_read_register(dev,
> VPU_PRODUCT_CODE_REGISTER);
>  	ret = wave5_vdi_init(&pdev->dev);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -281,6 +277,7 @@ static void wave5_vpu_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)  static const struct wave5_match_data ti_wave521c_data = {
>  	.flags = WAVE5_IS_ENC | WAVE5_IS_DEC,
>  	.fw_name = "cnm/wave521c_k3_codec_fw.bin",
> +	.sram_size = (64 * 1024),
>  };
> 
>  static const struct of_device_id wave5_dt_ids[] = {
> --
> 2.44.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ