linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf] arm32, bpf: Fix sign-extension mov instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240409095038.26356-1-puranjay@kernel.org>
Date: Tue,  9 Apr 2024 09:50:38 +0000
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: puranjay12@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf] arm32, bpf: Fix sign-extension mov instruction

The current implementation of the mov instruction with sign extension
clobbers the source register because it sign extends the source and then
moves it to the destination.

Fix this by moving the src to a temporary register before doing the sign
extension only if src is not an emulated register (on the scratch stack).

Also fix the emit_a32_movsx_r64() to put the register back on scratch
stack if that register is emulated on stack.

Fixes: fc832653fa0d ("arm32, bpf: add support for sign-extension mov instruction")
Reported-by: syzbot+186522670e6722692d86@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000e9a8d80615163f2a@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index 1d672457d02f..8fde6ab66cb4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -878,6 +878,13 @@ static inline void emit_a32_mov_r(const s8 dst, const s8 src, const u8 off,
 
 	rt = arm_bpf_get_reg32(src, tmp[0], ctx);
 	if (off && off != 32) {
+		/* If rt is not a stacked register, move it to tmp, so it doesn't get clobbered by
+		 * the shift operations.
+		 */
+		if (rt == src) {
+			emit(ARM_MOV_R(tmp[0], rt), ctx);
+			rt = tmp[0];
+		}
 		emit(ARM_LSL_I(rt, rt, 32 - off), ctx);
 		emit(ARM_ASR_I(rt, rt, 32 - off), ctx);
 	}
@@ -919,15 +926,15 @@ static inline void emit_a32_movsx_r64(const bool is64, const u8 off, const s8 ds
 	const s8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
 	const s8 *rt;
 
-	rt = arm_bpf_get_reg64(dst, tmp, ctx);
-
 	emit_a32_mov_r(dst_lo, src_lo, off, ctx);
 	if (!is64) {
 		if (!ctx->prog->aux->verifier_zext)
 			/* Zero out high 4 bytes */
 			emit_a32_mov_i(dst_hi, 0, ctx);
 	} else {
+		rt = arm_bpf_get_reg64(dst, tmp, ctx);
 		emit(ARM_ASR_I(rt[0], rt[1], 31), ctx);
+		arm_bpf_put_reg64(dst, rt, ctx);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.40.1