linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] vp_vdpa: don't allocate unused msix vectors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ffab38f0-2ec6-4ed2-b0f8-398f2829b71d@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:56:43 +0800
From: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: lyx634449800 <yuxue.liu@...uarmicro.com>
Cc: angus.chen@...uarmicro.com, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] vp_vdpa: don't allocate unused msix vectors



在 2024/4/9 下午4:58, lyx634449800 写道:
> From: Yuxue Liu <yuxue.liu@...uarmicro.com>
>
> When there is a ctlq and it doesn't require interrupt
> callbacks,the original method of calculating vectors
> wastes hardware msi or msix resources as well as system
> IRQ resources.
>
> When conducting performance testing using testpmd in the
> guest os, it was found that the performance was lower compared
> to directly using vfio-pci to passthrough the device
>
> In scenarios where the virtio device in the guest os does
> not utilize interrupts, the vdpa driver still configures
> the hardware's msix vector. Therefore, the hardware still
> sends interrupts to the host os. Because of this unnecessary
> action by the hardware, hardware performance decreases, and
> it also affects the performance of the host os.
>
> Before modification:(interrupt mode)
>   32:  0   0  0  0 PCI-MSI 32768-edge    vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-0
>   33:  0   0  0  0 PCI-MSI 32769-edge    vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-1
>   34:  0   0  0  0 PCI-MSI 32770-edge    vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-2
>   35:  0   0  0  0 PCI-MSI 32771-edge    vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-config
>
> After modification:(interrupt mode)
>   32:  0  0  1  7   PCI-MSI 32768-edge  vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-0
>   33: 36  0  3  0   PCI-MSI 32769-edge  vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-1
>   34:  0  0  0  0   PCI-MSI 32770-edge  vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-config
>
> Before modification:(virtio pmd mode for guest os)
>   32:  0   0  0  0 PCI-MSI 32768-edge    vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-0
>   33:  0   0  0  0 PCI-MSI 32769-edge    vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-1
>   34:  0   0  0  0 PCI-MSI 32770-edge    vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-2
>   35:  0   0  0  0 PCI-MSI 32771-edge    vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-config
>
> After modification:(virtio pmd mode for guest os)
>   32: 0  0  0   0   PCI-MSI 32768-edge   vp-vdpa[0000:00:02.0]-config
>
> To verify the use of the virtio PMD mode in the guest operating
> system, the following patch needs to be applied to QEMU:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240408073311.2049-1-yuxue.liu@jaguarmicro.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuxue Liu <yuxue.liu@...uarmicro.com>
> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> V4: Update the title and assign values to uninitialized variables
> V3: delete unused variables and add validation records
> V2: fix when allocating IRQs, scan all queues
>
>   drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> index df5f4a3bccb5..74bc8adfc7e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,14 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>   	struct pci_dev *pdev = mdev->pci_dev;
>   	int i, ret, irq;
>   	int queues = vp_vdpa->queues;
> -	int vectors = queues + 1;
> +	int vectors = 0;
> +	int msix_vec = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> +		if (vp_vdpa->vring[i].cb.callback)
> +			vectors++;
> +	}
> +	vectors++;
>   
>   	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, vectors, vectors, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
>   	if (ret != vectors) {
> @@ -173,9 +180,12 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>   	vp_vdpa->vectors = vectors;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
> +		if (!vp_vdpa->vring[i].cb.callback)
> +			continue;
> +
>   		snprintf(vp_vdpa->vring[i].msix_name, VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE,
>   			"vp-vdpa[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
> -		irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, i);
> +		irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, msix_vec);
>   		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>   				       vp_vdpa_vq_handler,
>   				       0, vp_vdpa->vring[i].msix_name,
> @@ -185,21 +195,22 @@ static int vp_vdpa_request_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
>   				"vp_vdpa: fail to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
>   			goto err;
>   		}
> -		vp_modern_queue_vector(mdev, i, i);
> +		vp_modern_queue_vector(mdev, i, msix_vec);
>   		vp_vdpa->vring[i].irq = irq;
> +		msix_vec++;
>   	}
>   
>   	snprintf(vp_vdpa->msix_name, VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE, "vp-vdpa[%s]-config\n",
>   		 pci_name(pdev));
> -	irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, queues);
> +	irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, msix_vec);
>   	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,	vp_vdpa_config_handler, 0,
>   			       vp_vdpa->msix_name, vp_vdpa);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> -			"vp_vdpa: fail to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
> +			"vp_vdpa: fail to request irq for config, ret %d\n", ret);
>   			goto err;
>   	}
> -	vp_modern_config_vector(mdev, queues);
> +	vp_modern_config_vector(mdev, msix_vec);
>   	vp_vdpa->config_irq = irq;
>   
>   	return 0;

Reviewed-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com>