linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] spi: cadence-qspi: add early busywait to cqspi_wait_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D0FID4G7T4N0.194WATCMTOUEY@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:09:17 +0200
From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
To: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "Vaishnav Achath" <vaishnav.a@...com>, "Thomas Bogendoerfer"
 <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
 <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "Vladimir
 Kondratiev" <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, "Gregory CLEMENT"
 <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "Tawfik Bayouk"
 <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] spi: cadence-qspi: add early busywait to
 cqspi_wait_for_bit()

Hello,

On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 6:40 PM CEST, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 04:42:43PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 4:16 PM CEST, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:02:18PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
>
> > > > The reason is to avoid hrtimer interrupts on the system. All read
> > > > operations take less than 100µs.
>
> > > Why would this be platform specific, this seems like a very standard
> > > optimisation technique?
>
> > It does not make sense if you know that all read operations take more
> > than 100µs. I preferred being conservative. If you confirm it makes
> > sense I'll remove the quirk.
>
> It does seem plausible at least, and the time could be made a tuneable
> with quirks or otherwise if that's needed.  I think I'd expect the MIPS
> platform you're working with to be towards the lower end of performance
> for systems that are new enough to have this hardware.

Next revision will do the same busywait behavior unconditionally then.

Thanks!

--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com