linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: Add missing memory barrier in switch_mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZhUVpwwqKxWKgU0Q@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:17:11 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "levi . yun" <yeoreum.yun@....com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Add missing memory barrier in switch_mm_cid

On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 10:07:19AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 35389b2af88e..0d5e54201eb2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ do {									\
>  #define __smp_mb__before_atomic()	do { } while (0)
>  #define __smp_mb__after_atomic()	do { } while (0)
>  
> +/* Writing to CR3 provides a full memory barrier in switch_mm(). */
> +#define smp_mb__after_switch_mm()	do { } while (0)
> +
>  #include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> index 961f4d88f9ef..5a6c94d7a598 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> @@ -296,5 +296,13 @@ do {									\
>  #define io_stop_wc() do { } while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * Architectures that guarantee an implicit smp_mb() in switch_mm()
> + * can override smp_mb__after_switch_mm.
> + */
> +#ifndef smp_mb__after_switch_mm
> +#define smp_mb__after_switch_mm()	smp_mb()
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>  #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_BARRIER_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 2e5a95486a42..044d842c696c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@
>  # include <asm/paravirt_api_clock.h>
>  #endif
>  
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> +
>  #include "cpupri.h"
>  #include "cpudeadline.h"
>  
> @@ -3481,13 +3483,19 @@ static inline void switch_mm_cid(struct rq *rq,
>  		 * between rq->curr store and load of {prev,next}->mm->pcpu_cid[cpu].
>  		 * Provide it here.
>  		 */
> -		if (!prev->mm)                          // from kernel
> +		if (!prev->mm) {                        // from kernel
>  			smp_mb();
> -		/*
> -		 * user -> user transition guarantees a memory barrier through
> -		 * switch_mm() when current->mm changes. If current->mm is
> -		 * unchanged, no barrier is needed.
> -		 */
> +		} else {				// from user
> +			/*
> +			 * user -> user transition relies on an implicit
> +			 * memory barrier in switch_mm() when
> +			 * current->mm changes. If the architecture
> +			 * switch_mm() does not have an implicit memory
> +			 * barrier, it is emitted here.  If current->mm
> +			 * is unchanged, no barrier is needed.
> +			 */
> +			smp_mb__after_switch_mm();
> +		}

I'm fine with the change from the arm64 perspective but I guess we need
an ack from the x86 and sched maintainers. FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

-- 
Catalin