linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: rtc: lpc32xx-rtc: move to trivial-rtc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240409121153e2941468@mail.local>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:11:53 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: rtc: lpc32xx-rtc: move to trivial-rtc

On 09/04/2024 10:52:54+0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 4/9/24 09:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 08/04/2024 17:53, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> >> This RTC requires a compatible, a reg and a single interrupt,
> >> which makes it suitable for a direct conversion into trivial-rtc.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/lpc32xx-rtc.txt  | 15 ---------------
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/trivial-rtc.yaml |  2 ++
> >>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This one no... and if you tested DTS you would see errors, although you
> > need to test specific lpc config, not multi_v7.
> > 
> > It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
> > `make dtbs_check W=1` (see
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
> > https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
> > for instructions).
> > 
> > Anyway, you *must* check all DTS before moving anything to trivial.
> > 
> > Does it mean all other bindings were not checked against DTS at all?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> > 
> Hi,
> 
> I did check the conversion against nxp/lpc/lpc3250-phy3250.dts, which
> throws a message about the 'clocks' property.
> 
> That property is not documented in the original binding, and even though
> it could be missing, I could not find any function to get a clock (i.e.
> any form of clk_get()) in rtc-lpc32xx.c, which is the only file where
> the compatible can be found.
> 
> Is therefore the property not useless in the dts? My apologies if I am
> missing something here.

The bindings doesn't document the driver but the hardware. In this case,
the only input clock seems to be a 32kHz crystal.

> 
> Thanks and best regards,
> Javier Carrasco

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com