linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] KVM: x86: Fix LVTPC masking on AMD CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <171262747625.1420673.10308591615885503972.b4-ty@google.com>
Date: Mon,  8 Apr 2024 19:01:27 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, 
	Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] KVM: x86: Fix LVTPC masking on AMD CPUs

On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 16:55:53 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This is kinda sorta v2 of Sandipan's fix for KVM's incorrect setting of
> the MASK bit when delivering PMIs through the LVTPC.
> 
> It's a bit rushed, as I want to get Sandipan's fix applied early next
> week so that it can make its way to Linus' tree for -rc4.  And I didn't
> want to apply Sandipan's patch as-is, because I'm a little paranoid that
> the guest CPUID check could be noticeable slow, and it's easy to avoid.
> 
> [...]

Applied 1 and 2 to kvm-x86 fixes. 

[01/10] KVM: x86: Snapshot if a vCPU's vendor model is AMD vs. Intel compatible
        https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/3b764d0af391
[02/10] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not mask LVTPC when handling a PMI on AMD platforms
        https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/85cff527ab31

--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next