lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 06:25:04 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
 <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 12/12] mm: page_frag: update documentation
 and maintainer for page_frag

On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:59:58 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> > Just to be clear this isn't an Ack, but if you are going to list
> > maintainers for this my name should be on the list so this is the
> > preferred format. There are still some things to be cleaned up in this
> > patch.  
> 
> Sure, I was talking about "Alexander seems to be the orginal author for
> page_frag, we can add him to the MAINTAINERS later if we have an ack from
> him." in the commit log.

Do we have to have a MAINTAINERS entry for every 1000 lines of code?
It really feels forced :/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ