[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8e9a7a0-6fcf-4bbe-a659-b2360f5980d8@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:43:45 +0100
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
<linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: soc-card: soc-card-test: Fix some error handling
in probe()
On 10/4/24 15:22, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Fix this reversed if statement and call put_device() before returning
> the error code.
>
> Fixes: ef7784e41db7 ("ASoC: soc-card: Add KUnit test case for snd_soc_card_get_kcontrol")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> v2: call put_device()
>
> sound/soc/soc-card-test.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-card-test.c b/sound/soc/soc-card-test.c
> index 075c52fe82e5..faf9a3d46884 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-card-test.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-card-test.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,10 @@ static int soc_card_test_case_init(struct kunit *test)
> priv->card->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>
> ret = snd_soc_register_card(priv->card);
> - if (!ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + put_device(priv->card_dev);
> return ret;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
I can see that put_device() is also missing earlier in the
function:
if (!priv->card)
return -ENOMEM;
I can send a fix for that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists