[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8be5a179-df13-4441-8276-504dcb925026@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:48:02 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog/wdt-main: Use cpumask_of() to avoid cpumask var
on stack
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:13:59PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
> In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
> for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
> stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
>
> Use cpumask_of() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on the stack
>
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c b/drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c
> index 0fe71f7e66d5..52d49e4e35a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c
> @@ -381,11 +381,7 @@ static int octeon_wdt_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>
> /* Must set the irq affinity here */
> if (octeon_has_feature(OCTEON_FEATURE_CIU3)) {
> - cpumask_t mask;
> -
> - cpumask_clear(&mask);
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &mask);
> - irq_set_affinity(irq, &mask);
> + irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(cpu));
> }
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &irq_enabled_cpus);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists