lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240410034846.167421-1-linma@zju.edu.cn>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:48:46 +0800
From: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>
To: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
	andreyknvl@...gle.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v1] net: nfc: remove inappropriate attrs check

Revert "NFC: fix attrs checks in netlink interface"
This reverts commit 18917d51472fe3b126a3a8f756c6b18085eb8130.

Our checks found weird attrs present check in function
nfc_genl_dep_link_down() and nfc_genl_llc_get_params(), which are
introduced by commit 18917d51472f ("NFC: fix attrs checks in netlink
interface").

According to its message, it should add checks for functions
nfc_genl_deactivate_target() and nfc_genl_fw_download(). However, it
didn't do that. In fact, the expected checks are added by
(1) commit 385097a36757 ("nfc: Ensure presence of required attributes in
the deactivate_target handler") and
(2) commit 280e3ebdafb8 ("nfc: Ensure presence of NFC_ATTR_FIRMWARE_NAME
attribute in nfc_genl_fw_download()"). Perhaps something went wrong.

Anyway, the attr NFC_ATTR_TARGET_INDEX is never accessed in callback
nfc_genl_dep_link_down() and same for NFC_ATTR_FIRMWARE_NAME and
nfc_genl_llc_get_params(). Thus, remove those checks.

Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>
---
 net/nfc/netlink.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/nfc/netlink.c b/net/nfc/netlink.c
index aa1dbf654c3e..dd2ce73a24fb 100644
--- a/net/nfc/netlink.c
+++ b/net/nfc/netlink.c
@@ -969,8 +969,7 @@ static int nfc_genl_dep_link_down(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	int rc;
 	u32 idx;
 
-	if (!info->attrs[NFC_ATTR_DEVICE_INDEX] ||
-	    !info->attrs[NFC_ATTR_TARGET_INDEX])
+	if (!info->attrs[NFC_ATTR_DEVICE_INDEX])
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	idx = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NFC_ATTR_DEVICE_INDEX]);
@@ -1018,8 +1017,7 @@ static int nfc_genl_llc_get_params(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	struct sk_buff *msg = NULL;
 	u32 idx;
 
-	if (!info->attrs[NFC_ATTR_DEVICE_INDEX] ||
-	    !info->attrs[NFC_ATTR_FIRMWARE_NAME])
+	if (!info->attrs[NFC_ATTR_DEVICE_INDEX])
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	idx = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NFC_ATTR_DEVICE_INDEX]);
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ