| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fVtLbRva9KLMdDPNMkF-F9LDp-3C10RymC-QbYdtwEbQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:47:12 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: "Wang, Weilin" <weilin.wang@...el.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Taylor, Perry" <perry.taylor@...el.com>,
"Alt, Samantha" <samantha.alt@...el.com>, "Biggers, Caleb" <caleb.biggers@...el.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 14/15] perf stat: Add tool events support in hardware-grouping
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 1:51 PM Wang, Weilin <weilin.wang@...el.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2024 10:56 PM
> > To: Wang, Weilin <weilin.wang@...el.com>
> > Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>; Namhyung Kim
> > <namhyung@...nel.org>; Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>;
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>;
> > Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>; Jiri Olsa
> > <jolsa@...nel.org>; Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@...el.com>; linux-perf-
> > users@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Taylor, Perry
> > <perry.taylor@...el.com>; Alt, Samantha <samantha.alt@...el.com>; Biggers,
> > Caleb <caleb.biggers@...el.com>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 14/15] perf stat: Add tool events support in
> > hardware-grouping
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 7:14 PM <weilin.wang@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Add tool events into default_core grouping strings if find tool events so
> > > that metrics use tool events could be correctly calculated. Need this step
> > > to support TopdownL4-L5.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 49
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> > > index cfdbb5f7fb77..e5b8456d0405 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> > > @@ -1486,6 +1486,35 @@ static void find_tool_events(const struct
> > list_head *metric_list,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * get_tool_event_str - Generate and return a string with all the used tool
> > > + * event names.
> > > + */
> > > +static int get_tool_event_str(struct strbuf *events,
> > > + const bool tool_events[PERF_TOOL_MAX],
> > > + bool *has_tool_event)
> > > +{
> > > + int i = 0;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + perf_tool_event__for_each_event(i) {
> > > + if (tool_events[i]) {
> > > + const char *tmp = strdup(perf_tool_event__to_str(i));
> > > +
> > > + if (!tmp)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + *has_tool_event = true;
> > > + ret = strbuf_addstr(events, ",");
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + ret = strbuf_addstr(events, tmp);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * build_combined_expr_ctx - Make an expr_parse_ctx with
> > all !group_events
> > > * metric IDs, as the IDs are held in a set,
> > > @@ -2049,6 +2078,7 @@ static int assign_event_grouping(struct
> > metricgroup__event_info *e,
> > >
> > > static int hw_aware_metricgroup__build_event_string(struct list_head
> > *group_strs,
> > > const char *modifier,
> > > + const bool tool_events[PERF_TOOL_MAX],
> > > struct list_head *groups)
> > > {
> > > struct metricgroup__pmu_group_list *p;
> > > @@ -2056,8 +2086,12 @@ static int
> > hw_aware_metricgroup__build_event_string(struct list_head *group_strs
> > > struct metricgroup__group_events *ge;
> > > bool no_group = true;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > > + struct strbuf tool_event_str = STRBUF_INIT;
> > > + bool has_tool_event = false;
> > >
> > > #define RETURN_IF_NON_ZERO(x) do { if (x) return x; } while (0)
> > > + ret = get_tool_event_str(&tool_event_str, tool_events,
> > &has_tool_event);
> >
> > Does metricgroup__build_event_string need updating to use this helper
> > function too?
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> In parse_ids, tool events are inserted to the ids that passed to
> metricgroup__build_event_string. If we want to use this function here, I think
> we also need to update the code in parse_ids to not insert tool events.
>
> I could add this change if you think we should do this update.
I like code-reuse and sharing logic whenever possible, it seems
potentially messy though. I'll leave it up to your judgement as to
whether it is worth cleaning up. Perhaps there should be a TODO if
not.
Thanks,
Ian
> Thanks,
> Weilin
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> > > + RETURN_IF_NON_ZERO(ret);
> > >
> > > list_for_each_entry(p, groups, nd) {
> > > list_for_each_entry(g, &p->group_head, nd) {
> > > @@ -2129,6 +2163,12 @@ static int
> > hw_aware_metricgroup__build_event_string(struct list_head *group_strs
> > > }
> > > ret = strbuf_addf(events, "}:W");
> > > RETURN_IF_NON_ZERO(ret);
> > > +
> > > + if (!strcmp(p->pmu_name, "default_core") && has_tool_event)
> > {
> > > + ret = strbuf_addstr(events, tool_event_str.buf);
> > > + RETURN_IF_NON_ZERO(ret);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > pr_debug("events-buf: %s\n", events->buf);
> > > list_add_tail(&new_group_str->nd, group_strs);
> > > }
> > > @@ -2214,6 +2254,7 @@ static int hw_aware_build_grouping(struct
> > expr_parse_ctx *ctx,
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto err_out;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > ret = get_pmu_counter_layouts(&pmu_info_list, ltable);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto err_out;
> > > @@ -2259,6 +2300,7 @@ static void
> > metricgroup__free_grouping_strs(struct list_head
> > > */
> > > static int hw_aware_parse_ids(struct perf_pmu *fake_pmu,
> > > struct expr_parse_ctx *ids, const char *modifier,
> > > + const bool tool_events[PERF_TOOL_MAX],
> > > struct evlist **out_evlist)
> > > {
> > > struct parse_events_error parse_error;
> > > @@ -2272,7 +2314,8 @@ static int hw_aware_parse_ids(struct perf_pmu
> > *fake_pmu,
> > > ret = hw_aware_build_grouping(ids, &grouping);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto out;
> > > - ret = hw_aware_metricgroup__build_event_string(&grouping_str,
> > modifier, &grouping);
> > > + ret = hw_aware_metricgroup__build_event_string(&grouping_str,
> > modifier,
> > > + tool_events, &grouping);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > @@ -2407,6 +2450,7 @@ static int hw_aware_parse_groups(struct evlist
> > *perf_evlist,
> > > struct evlist *combined_evlist = NULL;
> > > LIST_HEAD(metric_list);
> > > struct metric *m;
> > > + bool tool_events[PERF_TOOL_MAX] = {false};
> > > int ret;
> > > bool metric_no_group = false;
> > > bool metric_no_merge = false;
> > > @@ -2425,11 +2469,14 @@ static int hw_aware_parse_groups(struct evlist
> > *perf_evlist,
> > > if (!metric_no_merge) {
> > > struct expr_parse_ctx *combined = NULL;
> > >
> > > + find_tool_events(&metric_list, tool_events);
> > > +
> > > ret = hw_aware_build_combined_expr_ctx(&metric_list,
> > &combined);
> > >
> > > if (!ret && combined && hashmap__size(combined->ids)) {
> > > ret = hw_aware_parse_ids(fake_pmu, combined,
> > > /*modifier=*/NULL,
> > > + tool_events,
> > > &combined_evlist);
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.42.0
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists