| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:38:33 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] perf annotate-data: Support event group display in
TUI
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 05:24:56PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:49:58PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Like in stdio, it should print all events in a group together.
>
> How to test this?
>
> You mean something like:
>
> root@...ber:~# perf record -a -e '{cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P,cpu_core/mem-stores/P}'
> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 8 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 4.980 MB perf.data (55825 samples) ]
>
> root@...ber:~#
>
> root@...ber:~# perf annotate --stdio --data-type
>
> And then having the same output in the TUI?
>
> Trying this...
Added, the following, ok?
And the --stdio has all the missing info in TUI:
Annotate type: 'union ' in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 (1131 samples):
event[0] = cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
event[1] = cpu_core/mem-stores/P
Committer notes:
Collect it:
root@...ber:~# perf record -a -e '{cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P,cpu_core/mem-stores/P}'
^C[ perf record: Woken up 8 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 4.980 MB perf.data (55825 samples) ]
root@...ber:~#
Then do it in stdio:
root@...ber:~# perf annotate --stdio --data-type
Annotate type: 'union ' in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 (1131 samples):
event[0] = cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P
event[1] = cpu_core/mem-stores/P
============================================================================
Percent offset size field
100.00 100.00 0 40 union {
100.00 100.00 0 40 struct __pthread_mutex_s __data {
48.61 23.46 0 4 int __lock;
0.00 0.48 4 4 unsigned int __count;
6.38 41.32 8 4 int __owner;
8.74 34.02 12 4 unsigned int __nusers;
35.66 0.26 16 4 int __kind;
0.61 0.45 20 2 short int __spins;
0.00 0.00 22 2 short int __elision;
0.00 0.00 24 16 __pthread_list_t __list {
0.00 0.00 24 8 struct __pthread_internal_list* __prev;
0.00 0.00 32 8 struct __pthread_internal_list* __next;
};
};
0.00 0.00 0 0 char* __size;
48.61 23.94 0 8 long int __align;
};
Now with TUI before this patch:
root@...ber:~# perf annotate --tui --data-type
Annotate type: 'union ' (790 samples)
Percent Offset Size Field
100.00 0 40 union {
100.00 0 40 struct __pthread_mutex_s __data {
48.61 0 4 int __lock;
0.00 4 4 unsigned int __count;
6.38 8 4 int __owner;
8.74 12 4 unsigned int __nusers;
35.66 16 4 int __kind;
0.61 20 2 short int __spins;
0.00 22 2 short int __elision;
0.00 24 16 __pthread_list_t __list {
0.00 24 8 struct __pthread_internal_list* __prev;
0.00 32 8 struct __pthread_internal_list* __next;
0.00 0 0 char* __size;
48.61 0 8 long int __align;
};
And now after this patch:
Annotate type: 'union ' (790 samples)
Percent Offset Size Field
100.00 100.00 0 40 union {
100.00 100.00 0 40 struct __pthread_mutex_s __data {
48.61 23.46 0 4 int __lock;
0.00 0.48 4 4 unsigned int __count;
6.38 41.32 8 4 int __owner;
8.74 34.02 12 4 unsigned int __nusers;
35.66 0.26 16 4 int __kind;
0.61 0.45 20 2 short int __spins;
0.00 0.00 22 2 short int __elision;
0.00 0.00 24 16 __pthread_list_t __list {
0.00 0.00 24 8 struct __pthread_internal_list* __prev;
0.00 0.00 32 8 struct __pthread_internal_list* __next;
};
};
0.00 0.00 0 0 char* __size;
48.61 23.94 0 8 long int __align;
};
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists