linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-mcu: Add the MCU domain watchdog instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2455386b-cf9c-4060-ba86-34ea80a5af6a@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:15:51 +0530
From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>
To: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <vigneshr@...com>, <nm@...com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kristo@...nel.org>, <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-mcu: Add the MCU domain
 watchdog instances

Hi Neha

On 3/26/2024 5:57 PM, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> There are 2 watchdog instances in the MCU domain. These instances are
> coupled with the MCU domain R55 instances. Reserve them as they are not
> used by A72.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>
> ---
>   .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi      | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> index b0f41e9829cc..867f307909be 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -694,4 +694,30 @@ wkup_esm: esm@...80000 {
>   		compatible = "ti,j721e-esm";
>   		reg = <0x00 0x42080000 0x00 0x1000>;
>   	};
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The 2 RTI instances are couple with MCU R5Fs so keeping them
> +	 * reserved as these will be used by their respective firmware
> +	 */
> +	mcu_watchdog0: watchdog@...00000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,j7-rti-wdt";
> +		reg = <0x00 0x40600000 0x00 0x100>;
> +		clocks = <&k3_clks 262 1>;
> +		power-domains = <&k3_pds 262 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +		assigned-clocks = <&k3_clks 262 1>;
> +		assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 262 5>;
> +		/* reserved for MCU_R5F0_0 */
> +		status = "reserved";
> +	};
> +
> +	mcu_watchdog1: watchdog@...10000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,j7-rti-wdt";
> +		reg = <0x00 0x40610000 0x00 0x100>;
> +		clocks = <&k3_clks 263 1>;
> +		power-domains = <&k3_pds 263 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +		assigned-clocks = <&k3_clks 263 1>;
> +		assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 263 5>;
> +		/* reserved for MCU_R5F0_1 */

Table 12-22642. MCU_RTI Hardware Requests (In same TRM referred in 3/4 
patch review ),

says each WDT has destination of MCU0_R5_CORE0 and MCU0_R5_CORE1

Please suggest, if fw level this is decided to reserved like above ?

With that clarification, Please use

Reviewed-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>


> +		status = "reserved";
> +	};
>   };