lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f999020f-0f07-4eb3-bc59-f1a0f7237af7@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:35:39 +0530
From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>
To: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <vigneshr@...com>, <nm@...com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kristo@...nel.org>, <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add the MAIN domain
 watchdog instances

Hi Neha

On 3/26/2024 5:57 PM, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> There are 4 watchdog instances in the MAIN domain:
> 	* one each for the 2 A72 cores
> 	* one each for the 2 R5F cores
>
> Currently, the devicetree only describes watchdog instances for the A72
> cores and enables them. Describe the remaining but reserve them as they
> will be used by their respective firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
> index 657f9cc9f4ea..c448c2218e23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
> @@ -1254,6 +1254,33 @@ watchdog1: watchdog@...0000 {
>   		assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 253 5>;
>   	};
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * The following RTI instances are coupled with MCU R5Fs so
> +	 * keeping them reserved as these will be used by their respective
> +	 * firmware
> +	 */
> +	watchdog2: watchdog@...0000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,j7-rti-wdt";
> +		reg = <0x00 0x23c0000 0x00 0x100>;
> +		clocks = <&k3_clks 258 1>;
> +		power-domains = <&k3_pds 258 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +		assigned-clocks = <&k3_clks 258 1>;
> +		assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 258 5>;
> +		/* reserved for MAIN_R5F0_0 */
> +		status = "reserved";
> +	};
> +
> +	watchdog3: watchdog@...0000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,j7-rti-wdt";
> +		reg = <0x00 0x23d0000 0x00 0x100>;
> +		clocks = <&k3_clks 259 1>;
> +		power-domains = <&k3_pds 259 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +		assigned-clocks = <&k3_clks 259 1>;
> +		assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 259 5>;
> +		/* reserved for MAIN_R5F0_1 */
> +		status = "reserved";
> +	};
> +

Please see, if this make more sense to have label as watchdog28 and 
watchdog29, to align with TRM.

Also request to add mcu domain 2 watchdog as well.


>   	main_timer0: timer@...0000 {
>   		compatible = "ti,am654-timer";
>   		reg = <0x00 0x2400000 0x00 0x400>;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ