linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] gve: Correctly report software timestamping capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:26:02 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: John Fraker <jfraker@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>,
 Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>, Shailend Chand
 <shailend@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@...el.com>, Ziwei
 Xiao <ziweixiao@...gle.com>, Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] gve: Correctly report software timestamping
 capabilities

On Mon,  8 Apr 2024 11:09:01 -0700 John Fraker wrote:
> gve has supported software timestamp generation since its inception,
> but has not advertised that support via ethtool. This patch correctly
> advertises that support.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Fraker <jfraker@...gle.com>

I think it should be a single line diff:

+	.get_ts_info = ethtool_op_get_ts_info,

right?