| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:55:18 +0200 From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>, Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>, "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>, "rafael.beims" <rafael.beims@...adex.com>, Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] wifi: mwifiex: add code to support host mlme On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 07:30 +0000, David Lin wrote: > Hi Johannes and Brian, > > I think this patch is used to leverage MLME of wpa_supplicant and hostapd. It won't affect the usage of cfg80211 for mwifiex. I wonder if I can prepare patch v10. No. That sentence tells me you've _still_ not understood any of the technical arguments in the thread, you're _still_ arguing with completely uninteresting arguments. Where before you had "it's well tested" and "it uses 'standard' APIs" now you're saying "it doesn't affect anyone else". All of that is obvious, and also completely besides the point. Please go back and actually _understand_ the discussion. Also actually _participate_ in the discussion too, so far you've pretty much only made empty arguments. Once you've understood the concerns and can explain why they don't apply, _then_ you can resend the patch. johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists