[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ecf2158-10d1-47b3-a02f-54a4cddbf426@baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:29:11 +0200
From: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/18] ASoC: dt-bindings: mediatek,mt8365-afe: Add
audio afe document
On 09/04/2024 17:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> + soc {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> + afe@...20000 {
> Did you implement the comment or decided to keep afe?
>
Though it was clear according to [1]:
"
Audio Front End, this is the same name used for other MTK SoC, to be
consistent.
Cook a new patch serie to change "afe" by "audio-controller" for all MTK
SoC would be great.
"
I want to keep it and fix it later with ALL other MTK SoC.
You didn't answer after that, I though it was ok for you...
So if you don't agree with that, just tell me to change it instead of
let me think I've the choice.
> BTW, whatever "consistency" you have in mind, it does not really matter
> that much for that example. And for sure do not add incorrect code
> intentionally just to fix it in next patch.
I don't get your point.
What do you mean by "do not add incorrect code intentionally" please ???
My PoV: I implement my bindings aligned to ALL other MTK SoC, which have
been validated by you in the past. I can understand the copied code is
wrong, but I've suggested a solution and you didn't NACK it.
I fell like you bully me. Are you ok to stop insinuating bad things
please and tell me directly if a fix is mandatory and if you are waiting
for a specific one, tell me directly to avoid this kind of unpleasant
talk and waste of time, I know maintainers are busy persons.
Beside that, thanks for your reviews.
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/eeb3329b-0558-4237-8343-4e11f65a6a35@baylibre.com/
--
Regards,
Alexandre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists