linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] perf: arm_spe: Only show online CPUs in device's "cpumask" attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240410095833.63934-2-yangyicong@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:58:33 +0800
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
To: <will@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf: arm_spe: Only show online CPUs in device's "cpumask" attribute

From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>

When there're CPUs offline after system booting, perf will failed:
[root@...alhost ~]# /home/yang/perf record -e arm_spe_0//
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 19 (No such device) for event (arm_spe_0//).
/bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.

This is due to PMU's "cpumask" is not updated and still contains offline
CPUs and perf will try to open perf event on the offlined CPUs.

Make "cpumask" attribute only shows online CPUs and introduced a new
"supported_cpus" where users can get the range of the CPUs this
PMU supported monitoring.

Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index 35f0de03416f..c3123570f955 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -254,13 +254,33 @@ static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
 			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	cpumask_var_t mask;
+	ssize_t n;
 
-	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus);
+	/* If allocation failed then show the supported_cpus */
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
+		return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus);
+
+	cpumask_and(mask, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus, cpu_online_mask);
+	n = cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, mask);
+	free_cpumask_var(mask);
+
+	return n;
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(cpumask);
 
+static ssize_t supported_cpus_show(struct device *dev,
+				   struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus);
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(supported_cpus);
+
 static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_cpumask.attr,
+	&dev_attr_supported_cpus.attr,
 	NULL,
 };
 
-- 
2.24.0