[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5cc958d-7945-43e5-b9af-c2d8e34d369f@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:27:09 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>, Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@...itsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per-cont(pte|pmd)
block
On 10/04/2024 10:46, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> A large part of the kernel boot time is creating the kernel linear map
>> page tables. When rodata=full, all memory is mapped by pte. And when
>> there is lots of physical ram, there are lots of pte tables to populate.
>> The primary cost associated with this is mapping and unmapping the pte
>> table memory in the fixmap; at unmap time, the TLB entry must be
>> invalidated and this is expensive.
>>
>> Previously, each pmd and pte table was fixmapped/fixunmapped for each
>> cont(pte|pmd) block of mappings (16 entries with 4K granule). This means
>> we ended up issuing 32 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table during the population
>> phase.
>>
>> Let's fix that, and fixmap/fixunmap each page once per population, for a
>> saving of 31 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table. This gives a significant boot
>> speedup.
>>
>> Execution time of map_mem(), which creates the kernel linear map page
>> tables, was measured on different machines with different RAM configs:
>>
>> | Apple M2 VM | Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra
>> | VM, 16G | VM, 64G | VM, 256G | Metal, 512G
>> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
>> | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%)
>> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
>> before | 153 (0%) | 2227 (0%) | 8798 (0%) | 17442 (0%)
>> after | 77 (-49%) | 431 (-81%) | 1727 (-80%) | 3796 (-78%)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
>> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@...itsu.com>
>> Tested-by: Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> index 495b732d5af3..fd91b5bdb514 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ bool pgattr_change_is_safe(u64 old, u64 new)
>> return ((old ^ new) & ~mask) == 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> - phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
>> +static pte_t *init_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> + phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
>> {
>> - pte_t *ptep;
>> -
>> - ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr);
>> do {
>> pte_t old_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>>
>> @@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> phys += PAGE_SIZE;
>> } while (ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>>
>> - pte_clear_fixmap();
>> + return ptep;
>> }
>>
>> static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
>> @@ -204,6 +201,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
>> {
>> unsigned long next;
>> pmd_t pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
>> + pte_t *ptep;
>>
>> BUG_ON(pmd_sect(pmd));
>> if (pmd_none(pmd)) {
>> @@ -219,6 +217,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
>> }
>> BUG_ON(pmd_bad(pmd));
>>
>> + ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr);
>> do {
>> pgprot_t __prot = prot;
>>
>> @@ -229,20 +228,20 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
>> (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0)
>> __prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
>>
>> - init_pte(pmdp, addr, next, phys, __prot);
>> + ptep = init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot);
>>
>> phys += next - addr;
>> } while (addr = next, addr != end);
>
> I reckon it might be better to leave init_pte() returning void, and move the
> ptep along here, e.g.
>
> ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr);
> do {
> ...
>
> init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot);
>
> ptep += pte_index(next) - pte_index(addr);
> phys += next - addr;
> } while (addr = next, addr != end);
>
>
> ... as that keeps the relationship between 'ptep' and 'phys' clear since
> they're manipulated in the same way, adjacent to one another.
>
> Regardless this looks good, so with that change or as-is:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>
> ... though I would prefer with that change. ;)
Yep, will change. And I'll do the same for pmd_init() too.
>
> Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists