[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6151dd67-702b-41e7-8e54-43d4d1178442@t-argos.ru>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:45:13 +0300
From: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Marijn
Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Add callback function pointer check before
its call
On 08.04.2024 19:51, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On 4/8/2024 1:55 AM, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
>> In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is
>> compared to NULL,
>> but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
>> Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
>>
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>
>
> Yes , as dmitry wrote, this should be Reported-by.
>
It is an established practice for our project, you can find 700+ applied
patches with similar line:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?qt=grep&q=linuxtesting.org
> But rest LGTM.
>
>> Fixes: c929ac60b3ed ("drm/msm/dpu: allow just single IRQ callback")
>> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
>> index 946dd0135dff..03a16fbd4c99 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
>> @@ -223,9 +223,11 @@ static void dpu_core_irq_callback_handler(struct
>> dpu_kms *dpu_kms, unsigned int
>> VERB("IRQ=[%d, %d]\n", DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx));
>> - if (!irq_entry->cb)
>> + if (!irq_entry->cb) {
>> DRM_ERROR("no registered cb, IRQ=[%d, %d]\n",
>> DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx));
>> + return;
>> + }
>> atomic_inc(&irq_entry->count);
--
Kind regards
Aleksandr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists