[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240410015802.265220-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:58:02 +0800
From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
To: <mhiramat@...nel.org>
CC: <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] kprobes: Fix possible use-after-free issue on kprobe registration
When unloading a module, its state is changing MODULE_STATE_LIVE ->
MODULE_STATE_GOING -> MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED. Each change will take
a time. `is_module_text_address()` and `__module_text_address()`
works with MODULE_STATE_LIVE and MODULE_STATE_GOING.
If we use `is_module_text_address()` and `__module_text_address()`
separately, there is a chance that the first one is succeeded but the
next one is failed because module->state becomes MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED
between those operations.
In `check_kprobe_address_safe()`, if the second `__module_text_address()`
is failed, that is ignored because it expected a kernel_text address.
But it may have failed simply because module->state has been changed
to MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED. In this case, arm_kprobe() will try to modify
non-exist module text address (use-after-free).
To fix this problem, we should not use separated `is_module_text_address()`
and `__module_text_address()`, but use only `__module_text_address()`
once and do `try_module_get(module)` which is only available with
MODULE_STATE_LIVE.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
v3:
- Update commit messages as suggested by Masami.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240409224922.5f192e8ace5f7a90937bfa69@kernel.org/
- Also change to a more appropriate title.
v2:
- Update commit messages and comments as suggested by Masami.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240408115038.b0c85767bf1f249eccc32fff@kernel.org/
- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240408083403.3302274-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com/
v1:
- Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240407035904.2556645-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com/
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 9d9095e81792..65adc815fc6e 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1567,10 +1567,17 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
jump_label_lock();
preempt_disable();
- /* Ensure it is not in reserved area nor out of text */
- if (!(core_kernel_text((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
- is_module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr)) ||
- in_gate_area_no_mm((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
+ /* Ensure the address is in a text area, and find a module if exists. */
+ *probed_mod = NULL;
+ if (!core_kernel_text((unsigned long) p->addr)) {
+ *probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
+ if (!(*probed_mod)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ /* Ensure it is not in reserved area. */
+ if (in_gate_area_no_mm((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
within_kprobe_blacklist((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
jump_label_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
static_call_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
@@ -1580,8 +1587,7 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
goto out;
}
- /* Check if 'p' is probing a module. */
- *probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
+ /* Get module refcount and reject __init functions for loaded modules. */
if (*probed_mod) {
/*
* We must hold a refcount of the probed module while updating
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists