linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 04/18] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: Migrate to mtk_soundcard_common

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:46:12 +0200
From: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 broonie@...nel.org
Cc: wenst@...omium.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, robh@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 matthias.bgg@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
 trevor.wu@...iatek.com, maso.huang@...iatek.com,
 xiazhengqiao@...qin.corp-partner.google.com, arnd@...db.de,
 kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, shraash@...gle.com,
 nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
 dianders@...omium.org, frank.li@...o.com, allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com,
 eugen.hristev@...labora.com, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev,
 jarkko.nikula@...mer.com, jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com, alpernebiyasak@...il.com,
 ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com, zhourui@...qin.corp-partner.google.com,
 nfraprado@...labora.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
 shane.chien@...iatek.com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/18] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: Migrate to
 mtk_soundcard_common_probe



On 09/04/2024 13:32, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> @@ -29,6 +30,13 @@
>   #define RT1019_SPEAKER_AMP_PRESENT		BIT(1)
>   #define MAX98390_SPEAKER_AMP_PRESENT		BIT(2)
>   
> +#define DUMB_CODEC_INIT				BIT(0)
> +#define MT6359_CODEC_INIT			BIT(1)
> +#define RT1011_CODEC_INIT			BIT(2)
> +#define RT1019_CODEC_INIT			BIT(3)
> +#define MAX98390_CODEC_INIT			BIT(4)
> +#define RT5682_CODEC_INIT			BIT(5)
> +

Why are you using defines+single variable to track inited parts in the 
probe function but do it in the different way for legacy_probe using 
bool: is5682s, init6359 ? AFAII, both can use the same method with the 
defines above.

>   #define RT1011_CODEC_DAI	"rt1011-aif"
>   #define RT1011_DEV0_NAME	"rt1011.2-0038"
>   #define RT1011_DEV1_NAME	"rt1011.2-0039"

-- 
Regards,
Alexandre