linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv12 1/4] genirq: Provide a snapshot mechanism for interrupt statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <875xwp480e.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:17:21 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>, dianders@...omium.org,
 liusong@...ux.alibaba.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pmladek@...e.com,
 kernelfans@...il.com, deller@....de, npiggin@...il.com,
 tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
 jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 1/4] genirq: Provide a snapshot mechanism for
 interrupt statistics

On Wed, Apr 10 2024 at 14:45, Bitao Hu wrote:
> On 2024/4/9 17:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> By the way, what do you think of my reason for using printk() instead of
> pr_crit()? Should I change this part of the code in v13?

Either way is fine. Just put a proper explanation into the change log if
you stick with printk().

Thanks,

        tglx