[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240411152459.53ofd6hmhfzgi6td@treble>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 08:24:59 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86/bugs: Replace CONFIG_SPECTRE_BHI_{ON,OFF} with
CONFIG_MITIGATION_SPECTRE_BHI
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> > @@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ enum bhi_mitigations {
> > };
> >
> > static enum bhi_mitigations bhi_mitigation __ro_after_init =
> > - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPECTRE_BHI_ON) ? BHI_MITIGATION_ON : BHI_MITIGATION_OFF;
> > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_SPECTRE_BHI_ON) ? BHI_MITIGATION_ON : BHI_MITIGATION_OFF;
>
> Uhm, after this patch there's no CONFIG_MITIGATION_SPECTRE_BHI_ON anymore,
> which is kindof nasty, as IS_ENABLED() doesn't generate a build failure for
> non-existent Kconfig variables IIRC ...
>
> So AFAICT this patch turns on BHI unconditionally.
>
> I've fixed as per the patch below, but please double check the end result
> in tip:x86/urgent once I've pushed it out..
Oof, thanks. The result in tip looks good.
We should add a permanent build time check to catch cases like this.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists